next js psql fullstack deployment size vs dot net blazor psql deployment size, all things will be installed in linux

By | 3 months ago

2024dotnetfullstacknext jsdeploymentlinux server

Comparing the deployment size of a full-stack application using Next.js with PostgreSQL versus a .NET Blazor application with PostgreSQL on a Linux server involves looking at the total disk space required for all the components of each stack. Here's a breakdown of what you can expect in terms of deployment size:

**1. Next.js with PostgreSQL Deployment Size**

When deploying a full-stack Next.js application with PostgreSQL on Linux, the main components to consider are:

**1.1. Next.js Application**

  • **Node.js Runtime**: The runtime environment for running the Next.js app.

    • **Size*: The Node.js runtime is approximately *100-150 MB**.

  • **Next.js Application Files**: The compiled and packaged Next.js application.

    • **Size*: This depends on the size of your application, including all dependencies, static assets, and server-side files. Typically, for a small to medium-sized application, it could range from *50 MB to 200 MB**.

  • **Node Modules**: The dependencies installed in the `node_modules` directory can vary significantly based on your app's dependencies.

    • **Size*: Commonly ranges between *100 MB to 500 MB** or more, depending on the number of dependencies.

**1.2. PostgreSQL Database**

  • **PostgreSQL Installation**: PostgreSQL server and its dependencies.

    • **Size*: Approximately *200-300 MB**.

  • **Database Size**: The size of the actual PostgreSQL database files, which will depend on the amount of data stored.

    • **Size**: Highly variable, starting from a few MB for a small database to several GB or more for larger datasets.

**1.3. Total Estimated Size for Next.js with PostgreSQL**

  • **Node.js + Next.js App*: *250-850 MB**.

  • **PostgreSQL*: *200-300 MB** (excluding data).

  • **Total*: Approximately *450 MB to 1.15 GB** (or more depending on the size of your app, dependencies, and database data).

**2. .NET Blazor with PostgreSQL Deployment Size**

Deploying a .NET Blazor application with PostgreSQL on Linux involves different components:

**2.1. .NET Blazor Application**

  • **.NET Runtime**: The .NET runtime required to run a Blazor application.

    • **Size*: Approximately *100-150 MB**.

  • **Blazor Application Files**: The compiled Blazor application files (DLLs, static assets, etc.).

    • **Size*: Typically around *30-100 MB** for a small to medium-sized Blazor app, though larger apps with more functionality could be more.

  • **Third-Party Libraries**: Any additional .NET libraries or NuGet packages your application depends on.

    • **Size*: Can range from *10 MB to 50 MB** or more, depending on the number of libraries.

**2.2. PostgreSQL Database**

  • **PostgreSQL Installation**: Same as for the Next.js setup.

    • **Size*: Approximately *200-300 MB**.

  • **Database Size**: Similar considerations as with the Next.js stack.

**2.3. Total Estimated Size for .NET Blazor with PostgreSQL**

  • **.NET Runtime + Blazor App*: *140-300 MB**.

  • **PostgreSQL*: *200-300 MB** (excluding data).

  • **Total*: Approximately *340 MB to 600 MB** (or more depending on the size of your app and database data).

**Comparison: Deployment Size Summary**

| Component | Next.js with PostgreSQL | .NET Blazor with PostgreSQL |

|----------------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|

| **Application Runtime** | 100-150 MB (Node.js) | 100-150 MB (.NET Runtime) |

| **Application Files** | 50-200 MB (Next.js) | 30-100 MB (Blazor) |

| **Dependencies/Libraries** | 100-500 MB (Node Modules) | 10-50 MB (NuGet Packages) |

| **PostgreSQL Server** | 200-300 MB | 200-300 MB |

| **Total (excluding database)** | 450 MB - 1.15 GB | 340 MB - 600 MB |

**Key Takeaways**

  1. **Size Efficiency**:

    • The .NET Blazor stack tends to have a smaller deployment size compared to a full-stack Next.js application when both are running with PostgreSQL, primarily because of the potentially larger size of `node_modules` in a Next.js app.

    • For smaller applications, the difference might be negligible, but as the number of dependencies grows, the size difference may become more significant.

  2. **Runtime Overhead**:

    • Both stacks have similar runtime overheads for their respective environments (Node.js vs. .NET runtime). The difference in overall size will mostly depend on the number and size of dependencies or libraries.

  3. **Database Size**:

    • The size of the PostgreSQL installation is identical in both setups, so the choice of stack does not impact this.

  4. **Ease of Deployment**:

    • **Next.js**: Offers a simpler setup if you are deploying to environments that are already Node.js-friendly (like many cloud platforms).

    • **Blazor**: Might be more straightforward in .NET-centric environments, especially if you are leveraging features like server-side Blazor or integrating with other .NET services.

**Conclusion**

While both deployment sizes are fairly reasonable for small to medium-sized applications, the choice between Next.js and .NET Blazor should be guided by factors like your team's familiarity with the stack, the specific requirements of the project, and the target environment rather than just the deployment size.